|
(Conspiracy Nation, 4/28/05)
-- In "Barney the Dinosaur Exposed," Conspiracy
Nation awoke to the connection between the insidious Barney the
Purple Dinosaur, torture in Iraq, and the infamous MK-Ultra mind
control project. (See http://www.shout.net/~bigred/Barney.html ) A
later google web search on "Barney dinosaur evil" has revealed that the
Barney menace was realized more than ten years ago by ordinary citizens. Barney belongs to a team of television baby-sitters vomited up
after so-called "women's liberation" forced mothers out of the home and
into the workplace. With mom largely absent, who would raise the kids?
Barney and his ilk helped fill the void. But who is this "Barney"? If he were a man or a woman, we'd
ask questions. However since Barney seems to be a "lovable furry
creature," there is a tendency not to be circumspect. In his novel, It, author Stephen King
correctly identified the "lovable clown" as perfect mask for ultimate
horror. Inside "Barney" is a non-autonomous human, who takes his orders
from producers, in turn guided by twisted psychologists, themselves
trained within universities. |
Barney is an "It" puppeteered by top-thinkers of the
military-industrial complex ensconced within the ivory tower. In Universities and the Capitalist
State, author Clyde Barrow detailed how the university system
had been penetrated by the CIA and the corporate/military alliance.
Long-since abandoned in the field of psychology (from "psyche," meaning
"soul") were humane approaches fathered by William James. In their
place arose Behavior Modification, which saw man as a machine whose
buttons could be pushed to whatever end. Such "soul-ologists"
("psyche-ologists") largely control what Barney does and says. Barney
is neither spontaneously creative nor autonomous; Barney is a puppet
controlled by a godless Puppet Master.
At first this conception was too mind-boggling to fully face. Early
alarmists, dimly groping with a profound realization, nervously laughed
as they struggled to come to grips with a cunning deception. They even
feared that Barney might come after them, and retaliate in some way.
(This proved to be accurate: some shady lawyers tried to intimidate the
anti-Barney movement.) One can see the tenuous tottering of a movement
trying to come to terms with something way bigger than themselves in
its early screeds.
A FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) on the anti-Barney movement, "The
Jihad To Destroy Barney," provides a good overview of the early
struggle. The genesis of the cooperative effort seems to have occurred
in a usenet site: alt.barney.dinosaur.die.die.die Barney, also
known as B'harnii and the Hell Wyrm, is castigated for presenting a
candy-coated unrealistic view of the world, for promoting groupthink,
for suppression of "negative" emotions, for inhibiting real-life
recognition of facial cues, and for promoting unsafe behavior. Various
guidelines for the anti-Barney counter-offensive are given, such as "To
force our views on others would be analogous to the actions of
B'harnii: forcing a virtue such as love and friendship without
explaining the worth of either is useless and destructive."
At another Internet site, Aimee Yermish describes how upon hearing
two children singing the carnivore's "I Love You" song, in a "dreamy
tempo" with no life to their singing, she knew something was odd. Not
familiar with the "Barney and Friends" show, she tuned in and got a
crash course in what it was about. Her verdict: "I'm not a
psychologist, but I'm also not stupid. Barney is not innocent, wholesome,
good-for-rug-rats fun. It models 'good' behavior, but only if you
define 'good' in a certain way. The main subtext of the show seems to
be that all negative emotions should simply be denied so that we can
all be happy, and that we should all conform to the group and accept
the leadership of other people instead of using our own ideas." (
http://solace.stanford.edu/~calliope/pub/barney/criticism )
Today, the "Barney Generation," surreptitiously raised by a furry
reptile, are coming of age. You may have noticed blank looks on their
faces, as if they are waiting for Barney to give them the answer. In
Iraq, they played a part in repeatedly blasting the Barney "I love you"
song at prisoners crowded into shipping containers. These prisoners, in
a situation similar to that suffered by members of the Branch Davidian
sect, most likely were unwilling subjects of psychological medical
experiments. Human guinea pigs are hard to come by for "scientists" in
the employ of a totalitarian state. The Waco Massacre had been the
prelude to a golden opportunity for experimenters, in Iraq. Pfc.
Lynndie
England, the Lee Harvey Oswald of the sickening affair, is the patsy
for something originating at a much higher level. How long will it be
before these experimenters turn their gaze upon you? Or have
they already done so?
-------
Conspiracy Nation
http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html