Diana Case Heats Up

(Conspiracy Nation, 5/14/02) -- Authors Jon King and John Beveridge hope to pressure authorities into reopening the investigation into the death of Princess Diana. They are circulating a petition at their web site, hoping that enough signatures gained will bring results.

At their web site, the authors include the foreword to their book, Princess Diana: The Hidden Evidence. The foreword, by HRH Prince Michael of Albany, supports early information reported by "Ru Mills" (pseudonym) soon after Diana's tragic death in August 1997.

Among other things, "Ru Mills" had claimed that "the current British Royal Family are imposters. The House of Windsor is a fraud. But the lineage of Lady Diana Spencer goes back to Charles II of the House of Stewart. The House of Stewart is of true royal blood." [1]

At the Hidden Evidence web site, (www.hiddenevidence.com) this claim is proven somewhat valid. Prince Michael writes, in part, as follows:

"Genealogically, of course, Diana was a Stuart; in her veins flowed the blood of Britain's ancient Royal Family, and this in itself was a problem. Indeed, for this reason alone Diana was always perceived as a threat by the Establishment, as well as by Britain's current Royal Family, the Windsor Dynasty (otherwise known as 'The Firm'). While her marriage to Prince Charles Windsor was of course a political marriage, serving to reintroduce the Stuart strain into the Windsor bloodline -- and thus, in an historical context at least, further justify the Windsor reign -- her marriage into The Firm was virtually unique in British history. In fact Diana was only the second truly British-born 'outsider' to marry into the German Hanover-Windsor Dynasty in all of its 300-year reign. And she paid a very dear price for the privilege. Her close relationship with her two boys, William and Harry, of course, and the fact that she actively protected them from the stifling, predictable future The Firm had in store for them, only added to the tensions that always existed between the upstart Stuart Princess and the uptight Windsor Household. In short, so far as the Windsors were concerned, Diana was a necessary bane."

In an interview from the issue #7, 2002, of Eye Spy! magazine, King and Beveridge give further information about Princess Diana's death. (Eye Spy!, incidentally, has an excellent web site of their own, www.eyespymag.com)

Princess Diana met with then-president Bill Clinton in 1997. She persuaded Clinton to support an international ban on landmines. This infuriated the U.S. billion-dollar landmine industry and propelled the Monica Lewinsky scandal.
Diana's campaign against landmines angered the American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). This is why the CIA co-operated with Britain's MI6 intelligence agency when it was decided upon to murder the princess.
The British Royal Family has an enormous vested interest in Angola and other African nations. They did not like Diana's anti-landmines campaign.
Diana had become expendable. She had served her purpose of breeding sow for the House of Windsor, giving her sons their Stuart-blood legitimacy [2]
The mechanics of the Diana assassination involved a method known as "the Boston brakes", so called because it was invented in Boston, Massachusetts. "The target vehicle's steering and/or brakes are remotely controlled from a passing vehicle by way of a fitted transceiver."
Diana's body was embalmed before it was autopsied. In France, that is against the law, since it hinders the reliability of the autopsy. This embalming hid the fact that Diana was pregnant at the time of her death.

Also killed in the August 1997 automobile "accident" was Dodi al Fayed, reportedly intimate with the princess and father of her unborn child. The two reportedly were planning on getting married. Such a symbolic marriage between Islam and Christianity would have been a potent force for peace in the Middle East, had the two not perished. Mohammed al Fayed, Dodi al Fayed's father, has been relentless in his own demand for the truth about what really happened, in Paris, on August 31st, 1997.

------- Notes -------
[1] qtd. in Vankin, Jonathan & Whalen, John. The 70 Greatest Conspiracies
Of All Time. ISBN: 0-8065-2033-7
[2] "breeding sow". Interpolated from Prince Michael's foreword to King and
Beveridge's book. The blunt term, "breeding sow", is used by Conspiracy Nation
to shock readers into understanding how Diana had been used then callously
tossed aside by the House of Windsor. Neither Prince Michael nor King and
Beveridge use such a blunt expression. 

-------
Conspiracy Nation. Think outside the box.
http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html