Puzzle Pieces Of Norman Hsu
(Conspiracy Nation, 09/09/07) – Norman Hsu, apparently a “bundler”, was apprehended in Colorado. The latest that can be ascertained is that Hsu is under guard in a hospital there. (For further background on “bundling,” see “Hsu's On First. What's On Second?” http://www.shout.net/~bigred/Hsu.html)
Did the MSM (Mainstream Media) slide down fire poles, hop into vans, then roar off to Hsu's hospital and set up camp there, around the clock? Is MSM interrupting broadcasts with breathless updates? Are cameras lined up outside the hospital?
No, instead there is a paltry dearth of news updates on Mr. Hsu. This is the first puzzle piece: that the Hsu case is being ignored. It is “the dog that did not bark,” itself a clue.
The MSM calls itself the “watchdog press.” The dog barked loud when an Idaho senator might have been playing footsy in a men's washroom. But for some unknown reason, the “watchdog” didn't bark when Norman Hsu walked by.
Some other puzzle pieces gathered by this editor:
Known associate of Norman Hsu is Raymond Kwok Chow, alias "Shrimp Boy.” He was a notorious gangster in Chinatown in the early 1990's. He says he has “gone clean” since those days. Some doubt, though, that Raymond “Shrimp Boy” Chow has reformed. (http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/09/facts_continue_to_come_to_ligh.html)
In the 1980's and early 1990's, San Francisco's Chinatown was the battleground of a bloody war between powerful gangs. Chow's gang "Wo Hop To" finally won. This was when Chow says he met Norman Hsu.
Chow's Wo Hop To gang is the American offshoot of one of the powerful Triads based in China. In August 1990, Hsu may have been kidnapped by Chow. Mr. Hsu claimed he had been assaulted several times and threatened. A lot of money was involved. Norman Hsu eventually “clammed up”, and “Shrimp Boy” was not charged.
Norman Hsu has “unexplained riches,” reports Mike McIntire in the New York Times. (“Shadowy Money Trail of a Fugitive Fund-Raiser,” September 9, 2007.) “The Hsu case has raised questions about campaigns’ use of bundlers to raise money.”
Winkle Paw and Paul Su are two other names connected to Hsu. Checks totaling thousands of dollars reportedly flew between Mr. Paw, Mr. Su, and Norman Hsu's variously-spelled companies. (McIntire, op. cit.)
Efforts by Mr. McIntire to speak with alleged members of the Hsu network were met by inscrutable and impenetrable oriental calm.
In Mount Carmel, Pennsylvania, 3 residents of the small town have been caught up in the Hsu saga. Danny Lee, Soe Win Lee and Yu-Fen Huang, managers of Newspring Packaging there, cut various campaign checks in tandem with Mr. Hsu. Kent Cooper, a former longtime Federal Election Commission official who continues to track the influence of money in politics, said such ties raise red flags, especially given the scope of the contributions from rural Pennsylvania. "You are way beyond coincidence here. You are talking about methodical patterns of giving to the same candidates. This is way out of the ordinary," said Cooper. "This is a coordinated effort." (“Donors in step with Hsu,” by Mario F. Cattabiani. Philadelphia Inquirer, September 8, 2007)
Norman Hsu's companies, as noted, were variously-spelled. There is a pattern here as well, also including non-existent addresses, and apparent fronts. Mr. Hsu developed a long trail of addresses, in some cases mystifying longtime occupants of the locations, according to the Wall Street Journal. (“What Made Norman Hsu Run?” by Ianthe Jeanne Dugan, et al. September 8, 2007, page A1.)
To reiterate some of the puzzle pieces:
MSM is not camped out at Norman Hsu's hospital. This is “the watchdog that did not bark.”
Raymond “Shrimp Boy” Chow says he has “gone clean.” He claims no longer to be the leader of the Wo Hop To gang. That gang is linked to powerful “Triads” (gangs) in Red China, and also to Norman Hsu.
Winkle Paw and Paul Su maintain inscrutable oriental silence on the matter.
Danny Lee, Soe Win Lee, and Yu-Fen Huang, of rural Pennsylvania, appear to belong to a network possibly organized by Norman Hsu.
Norman Hsu's variously-spelled companies, some with false addresses, could have been “fronts” (disguises) for something else.
Various Comments
Comments by Internet bloggers shed further light on the subject:
“I’m thinking we haven’t yet scratched the surface of how awesome this scandal is.”
“Chinese gangsters? Freemasons? It’s like a bad movie on a low-rent cable channel. All this lacks is a super-villain with an underground HQ and some hot female assassins.”
“Please, you guys, don’t let this thing die. Force the media to cover this... this story is unbelievably juicy and with the chinese gang angles, and fake companies, it’s like a freakin’ crime movie!!!”
“...and we still don't know where the money came from!”
“Please realize that [the NY] Times article is only covering one month in 2003. That is the only records they could get.”
Conspiracy Nation
http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html