![]() |
Sometime between Tuesday, November 28, 1922, and Thursday,
November 30,
1922, Howard Carter, the discoverer, and his patron the fifth Earl of
Carnarvon secretly entered Tutankhamun's chamber. They removed
souvenirs for themselves, along with a sheaf of papyri documents. |
George Edward Stanhope Molyneux Herbert -- Lord Carnarvon -- had
previously consulted "Cheiro" (Count Louis le Warner Hamon, 1866-1936),
a palmist and fortune teller. Following desecration of Tut's Tomb,
Cheiro sent a psychic warning to the Earl. Cheiro had been in occult
communication with one Meketaten,
daughter of Akhenaten, who may have been the father of Tutankhamun.
"No relics must be removed! Otherwise the Earl would die!"
But it was too late. Lord Carnarvon had already sequestered some
items. In April 1923, he sickened and died. Egyptian newspapers quickly
spread the story that the Earl had been killed by the spirit of King
Tut. A panic ensued amongst collectors of Egyptian antiquities. In
droves, packages were sent anonymously to various museums. Tutankhamun Terror spread worldwide.
A Madame Fraya warned: "The science of the ancient Egyptians was
quite advanced." Carnarvon, she intimated, had most assuredly been
killed by the pharoah's "Ka"
-- his ghost.
There followed more mysterious deaths. In September 1923, the Earl's
half-brother died unexpectedly. Jay Gould, railroad magnate, fell dead
soon after visiting Tut's tomb. A French Egyptologist, Georges
Benedite, died not long after violating the burial chamber. The
Egyptian Bey, Ali Kemel Fahmy, was shot dead by his wife soon after
daring to touch Tutankhamun's treasures.
The list of eerie Tut deaths is long. A profound fear gripped the
world. Movies dealing with the "curse of the mummy" began to appear.
In the long-ago times of Egypt, Yuya and Tuya were the parents of
Tiye. She, in turn, became wife to Amenhotep
III, father of Akhenaten, the "heretic" king.
Amenhotep III also was related to Tutankamun. Some say he sired Tut; others say Akhenaten
was the father.
The supreme god had been Amun,
but when Akhenaten, Amenhotep IV,
became pharoah, he "staged the ritual regicide of the old supreme god
Amun, and ordered the defacing of Amun's temples throughout Egypt, and
of all the old gods. The word for 'gods' (plural) was proscribed..." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atenism)
Replacing Amun was Aten, a
monotheistic Sun god. Amun had been a deification of air. To signify
the upheaval, Amenhotep IV became known as Akhenaten. The young Tut was
called, Tutankhaten:
"the living image of Aten." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amun)
Akhenaten's abrupt break away from Amun and henotheism "has lead
some to think he has some connection to the biblical character of Moses, although what that connection
is, is a matter of some considerable dispute." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aten)
At least one source has Akhenaten being, in fact, Moses. (http://www.shout.net/~bigred/LostArk.html)
Unfortunately, disasters such as plagues, famines, and possible
comet collision(s) with Earth (http://www.shout.net/~bigred/Ragnarok.html)
associated catastrophe with the new god Aten. The people believed
deserting Amun for Aten had lead to these punishments. "Akhenaten must be exiled, to appease Amun!" This may be the factual basis
for the biblical Exodus: Akhenaten being overthrown, and King Tut,
significantly renamed Tutankhamun
("the living image of Amun"), his replacement. If this is so, it casts
new light upon the origin of the Jews and their reputed historical
claim to Israel.
The original man, Adam, had been, according to one source, "the envoy of the moon." (See Tutankhamun: The Exodus Conspiracy
by Andrew Collins & Chris Ogilvie-Herald. London: Virgin Books,
2002. ISBN: 1-85227-972-9) The prophet Abraham, according to oral
tradition, had been born in Urfa, in southeast Turkey. He was a
follower of the moon god, "Sin." Akhenaten/Moses received the Ten
Commandments on Mount Sinai, meaning mountain "of sin" or "of the
moon." The biblical golden calf connects with the horns of the bull --
crescent-shaped and denoting a phase of the moon. There is, write
Collins & Ogilvie-Herald (op. cit.), "a clear connection between
the worship of the moon god and the roots of the Jewish faith." The
"face of Yahweh" means, in other words, the full moon. Crescents
signify Yahweh, Sin, and other Semitic moon gods. The crescent also,
ironically, forms an outright symbol of the Muslim religion.
Under Tutankamun, in consequence of disasters following replacement
of Amun by Aten, the "polluted" priests of Aten and their followers, as
well as Asiatic nomads (the Habiru), were expelled from Egypt.
Akhenaten/Moses would have been a follower of the solar god, but the
Habiru would have been rooted in worship of the moon god. So, when
Akhenaten/Moses went away, up into Mount Sinai, it would make sense for
fearful Habiru to have reverted to worship of the moon god, in the form
of a golden calf.
A trace of Judaism's Egyptian beginnings is seen in Psalm 104,
seeming to be a re-write of the "Hymn to the Aten."
If present-day Israel had been given by God to Akenaten/Moses, and not to "the Jews," that would call into question Zionist claims to the territory. What if the Pentateuch account is historically slanted? Suppose an alternate historical account had been found?
As mentioned, Howard Carter and Lord Carnarvon, in 1922, had
unearthed papyri documents in Tutankhamun's tomb. Both had at first
publicly aknowledged the find. Later, however, mention of the papers
vanished.
1922 was an awkward time for the fledgling Israel. (See "Start Of
Israel," http://www.shout.net/~bigred/StartOfIsrael.html)
A challenge to biblical claims, coming from the amazing discovery of an
ancient Egyptian tomb and documents therein, could have upset the
applecart.
So, if Collins & Ogilvie-Herald's (op. cit.) evidence is
correct, it looks like an historical cover-up has occurred. Why else
would Howard Carter, stymied by bureaucrats, have made a furious threat
to the British Consulate? "Get those bureaucrats off my back, or I will
publish the papyri documents, giving the true account of the Exodus!"
Given a cover-up of the Tut documents, a second look at the "Curse
Of King Tut" is in order. Which is more likely? A series of deaths of
persons connected to the documents caused by a "mummy's curse"? Or
politically-based murders, designed to prevent the true facts from
coming to light? Later, a false trail, a "mummy's curse" legend, could
have been tacked on, to muddy the waters.
-------
Conspiracy Nation
http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html