"Red Mercury" and Divergent Physics

(Conspiracy Nation, 01/07/07) -- "A key element in the quest of medieval alchemists was mercury. Nazi scientists worked with 'The Bell,' a device about nine feet high and five feet in diameter. 'Xerum 525,' possibly a radioactive isotope of mercury, was placed, in lead-lined bottles, inside 'The Bell.' The 'Xerum 525' was subjected to extremely high speeds and possibly sudden high voltage. What resulted? It may have been 'Red Mercury'....... but that is a different subject."

So reported Conspiracy Nation in its previous issue. ("Alchemical Implications Of Aether Vortices," http://www.shout.net/~bigred/Alchemical.html)

Traditional staged thermonuclear weapons consist of two parts, a fission "primary" and a fusion/fission "secondary". The energy released by the primary when it explodes is used to (indirectly) compress the secondary and start a fusion reaction within it. Conventional explosives are far too weak to provide the level of compression needed. ("Red Mercury," Wikipedia, Jan. 6, 2007. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_mercury)

Think of it as the atomic bomb, which then ignites the more powerful hydrogen bomb.

But suppose a fusion bomb without the A-bomb trigger. A pure fusion bomb would not require an atom bomb as the detonator. Most of the long-lived radiation in a conventional Hydrogen bomb does not come from the fusion reaction but from the atom bomb fuse. What if a "benign" detonator had been discovered? (Farrell, Joseph P. The SS Brotherhood Of The Bell. Adventures Unlimited Press, 2006)

In "SDI Causes Global Warming?" (http://www.shout.net/~bigred/SDI.html) and "Alchemical Implications Of Aether Vortices" (op. cit.), Conspiracy Nation broached the concept of a "divergent physics." During World War II, Nazi scientists unfairly rejected "Jewish physics" and branched off into a different realm. What they discovered was too "monstrous" for public consumption. It had to be hidden from laymen and strait-laced physicists. A secret physics continued apace after 1945, in the U.S. and elsewhere.

As often happens, this divergent physics has led to unforeseen side-effects, one of which may be so-called global warming. Arctic ice is melting. This is blamed on everyday people burning fossil fuels. But suppose the actual cause is related to, for example, the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).

SDI, dubbed "Star Wars," is not dead, according to a book first published in 2001. Way Out There In the Blue, written by a Pulitzer prize-winning journalist, reportedly claims the U.S. has spent $3 to $4 billion a year on "Star Wars" in almost every single year since Ronald Reagan left office. And, the author observes, there has been almost no public discussion on this issue for several years. (Publishers Weekly review, at amazon.com http://www.amazon.com/Way-Out-There-Blue-Reagan/dp/0743200233)

Another side-effect of the divergent physics may be Red Mercury. Red Mercury, writes Farrell (op. cit.), is "a powerful new type of conventional explosive, capable of triggering fusion reactions in deuterium and tritium without the need for an atomic bomb as the fuse, as some allege, making a 'pure fusion' bomb..." The Red Mercury subject is controversial, with some calling it an "Urban Myth." ("What is red mercury?" by Chris Summers. BBC News, July 25, 2006. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/5176382.stm)

Even this Red Mercury alone, without any secondary fusion, is frightening. In itself, claims Farrell (op. cit.), the Red Mercury is so powerful that a mere hand grenade of the substance "would be sufficient to blow a large ship out of the ocean."

The chemical signature of the Nazi "Xerum 525" is given by Farrell as Hg2Sb2O7. This is the same identifier given for Red Mercury by an independent, outside source. (http://nti.org/db/nistraff/1993/19930380.htm)

Edward Teller, known colloquially as "the father of the hydrogen bomb," dismissed claims of Red Mercury. ("Red Mercury," Wikipedia reference, op. cit.) Yet this is the same Edward Teller who reportedly wrote then-president Ronald Reagan, urging him to implement a "Space Defense Initiative" (later named "Strategic Defense Initiative" and nicknamed "Star Wars"). Farrell (op. cit.) reproduces documents published by Drs. Robert and Ryan Wood, the so-called Majic-12 (MAnhattan proJECT-12) Cooper-Cantwheel documents. Therein Dr. Teller warns Reagan about a "menace" which "does not originate here on earth but comes from space itself. The agent of mass destruction has no reasoning psychology other than the ultimate destruction of our civilization and our way of life as we know it." (emphasis added)

Now it is hard to believe Teller truly believed there was an extra-terrestrial menace. The point is, would Reagan have been dumb enough to believe Teller? "The Gipper" did speculate, on several occasions, about "alien threats." "I occasionally think," he said to the U.N. General Assembly in 1987, "how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world." ("President Reagan saw UFO, often spoke of a world united because of alien invasion," UFO Universe, 1998) Or could Reagan himself have been in-the-know, and his "out there" speculation part of an act whose purpose was to promote funds for secret, divergent physics? Notice also how Teller, in the 1980s, warns of an "agent of mass destruction," later re-coined as "weapons of mass destruction."

So Edward Teller may have been with the renegade physicists and so downplayed the reality of Red Mercury in order to protect the secrecy of divergent physics. Samuel Cohen, the "father of the neutron bomb," on the other hand insists that yes, Red Mercury exists. He claims that elements within the US power structure are deliberately keeping it "under wraps" due to the scary implications such a weapon would have on nuclear proliferation. ("Red Mercury," Wikipedia reference, op. cit.) The Soviets, says Cohen, had produced a number of "micro-nukes" based on red mercury, which are described as being about as large as a baseball and weighing 10 pounds. He claimed that 100 of these mini-nukes were in the hands of terrorists, including Saddam Hussein. ("Samuel Cohen," Wikipedia reference, Jan. 6, 2006. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Cohen)

Reportedly, Cohen further charges, "The Atomic Energy Commission denies red mercury but they lie through their teeth. And they have to." ("Red Mercury And The Strange Case Of Delmart Vreeland," by J. R. Nyquist. http://www.rense.com/general21/del.htm) Presumably the AEC must lie due to fear of mass panic were they to be truthful.

We all "know" Weapons of Mass Destruction were not found in Iraq. But "what if?" What if Red Mercury-based mini-nukes had been found? Suppose this is the case, and the Bush administration must stoically endure WMD taunts because otherwise there could be mass panic. And who can you ask, one way or the other, about it? Who is credible anymore?

-------
Conspiracy Nation
http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html