Vote Fraud In New Hampshire
(Conspiracy Nation, 01/11/08) – Yesterday, Conspiracy Nation reported, in part, “It almost goes without saying that yesterday's New Hampshire voting results were rigged.” (“Pakistan Plot Intensifies,” http://www.shout.net/~bigred/PakistanPlot.html). Further information on the New Hampshire primary vote fraud is coming to light. This is happening despite Mainstream Media (MSM) blanket saturation of various lies about what happened in New Hampshire.
There are still a few honest reporters in MSM. Robert C. Koehler of Tribune Media Services dares to “hoist a few red flags about the elections.” (http://www.commonwonders.com/). “[C]onsidering the notorious unreliability, not to mention hackability, of Diebold machines — the media might have hoisted a few red flags in the coverage, rather than immediately chalk the results up to Clinton’s tears and voter unpredictability,” writes Koehler.
Robert L. Mitchell, writing in ComputerWorld, notices how the opinion polls “did very well in representing the final results for the other candidates, such as Edwards and McCain,” but somehow were off in predicting the Hillary Clinton tally. (“Why Clinton victory doesn't compute,” Jan. 9, 2008)
A commentator at the ComputerWorld web site (http://blogs.computerworld.com/why_clinton_victory_doesnt_compute) adds that, “The tally of paper ballots, excluding the machine count, gives the win to [Barack] Obama.”
Another commentator also notices some “red flags,” suggesting rigged results in New Hampshire:
Delay in results;
Vote totals going down during the count;
Failure to release county results in live time.
Paul Joseph Watson of Prison Planet sees a Clinton whitewash. “Clinton's reversal of a 10-13 point pre-polling deficit to Obama is highly suspicious and smacks of vote fraud, especially considering the fact that the New York Senator gained a crucial 7% swing thanks to provably vulnerable Diebold electronic voting machines.” (http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/011008_clinton_fraud.htm)
Dennis Kucinich, one of the Democrat primary candidates, is reportedly demanding a recount of the New Hampshire vote. But Kucinich may be “walking into a trap,” according to an article at blackboxvoting.org. Election integrity advocate Nancy Tobi warns how a previous Nader recount done haphazardly and involving dubious personnel served only to validate shady machines. “A candidate asking for a recount may well be a tool used to 'prove' everything was okay and then that candidate will be further discredited,” she states. An assessment of chain of custody for ballots must first take place, or else any recount will be questionable.
There is also suspicion regarding vote counting in the Ron Paul candidacy. (http://www.bostonnow.com/blogs/boston911truthorg/2008/01/09/major-allegations-of-vote-fraud-in-new-hampshire)
In “Pakistan Plot Intensifies” (op. cit.), mention was made of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) shenanigans. Based on a report by Donald Hank (“The European Union Is An Evil Empire,” http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/hank/080101), some Republican Party members of the CFR were assessed to be Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson, and John McCain. Further checking shows Giuliani not to be a CFR member. However Fred Thompson and John McCain are listed by Wikipedia as indeed belonging to the CFR. Another CFR member is none other than Bill Clinton, husband of Hillary Clinton. It is worthwhile to glance through names in the list. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Members_of_the_Council_on_Foreign_Relations)
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), founded in 1921, is the brainchild of Cecil Rhodes and “Colonel” Edward House. The CFR purpose is reportedly to ensure that a cabal of Insiders gain increasing control over the world (New World Order). The Washington Post newspaper reportedly acknowledged that the CFR is “the nearest thing we have to a ruling establishment in the United States.” (qtd. in “Everything Is Under Control”, by Robert Anton Wilson).
The “two” political parties seem to have agreed to slice the pie in favor of Hillary Clinton in 2008.
Also reported in “Pakistan Plot Intensifies” (op. cit.) is that voters were bused in from neighboring states to tilt the New Hampshire primary towards Hillary Clinton. She is a New York senator and has control over the old Tammany Hall machine. Her rival, Barack Obama, is supported by the Chicago political machine. Can Chicago out-fox Tammany Hall? Stay tuned.
Conspiracy Nation
http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html